|
rollynumber1
|
rollynumber1
Posted 15 Years Ago
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 10 Years Ago
Posts: 42,
Visits: 107
|
All the attention should be put on crazy talk animator. as this program does the same thing with crazy talk so please try to enrich crazy talk animator and make it the best 2d program in the world. i believe you are one step closer of achieving this goal. what's the point of buying ct when i get cta ct should be drop cos cta is the future before other 2d programs copy your technology.
|
|
winterswimmer
|
winterswimmer
Posted 14 Years Ago
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 11 Years Ago
Posts: 2,
Visits: 45
|
I wasn't sure whether to buy Crazy Animator, or CrazyTalk 6, but eventually I bought CrazyTalk 6 Pro, for a number of reasons. E.g. I want the best possible results in creating faces that talk (designing my own faces, mostly). I can't take the risk of buying a program which is not dedicated for THIS task.
But I also want to make a suggestion for one important improvement, that CrazyTalk badly needs at the moment. CrazyTalk needs the ability to import phonemes, in a simple symbolic language for which third-party tools can generate "lip sync codes".
This is very important. Now... I am a PROLOG / A.I. programmer, also using other languages (and lots of pure Assembly language sometimes); I can write code that generates lip syncing script, (based on pure text only). And I also feel that the "next generation" of Text-to-Speech software will include lip-sync generation as a standard, some day.
You lose nothing by enabling people like me, to... effectively work FOR you; no payment is necessary for such programming efforts. :) Please consider it, it is a win-win situation good for all of us! (more later...)
_________ P.S. I am also (almost) completely bilingual, in English and in Greek (ex-UK-resident Greek).
I've already used your demo versions to create some videos, with thousands of views in YouTube, etc. I even tested CrazyTalk with Greek speech, and it worked; with lots of corrections by hand, of course, but... not much more than needed in English.
I bought CrazyTalk 6 Pro + Toolboxes today, because of much appreciation for this program. I've also seen CrazyTalk animator, but as I said, it is outside my main field of interest, which is generating convincing Talking Faces, for use in Videos and narration, etc.
|
|
Anonymous
|
Anonymous
Posted 14 Years Ago
|
|
Group: [0]
Last Active: -
Posts: 0,
Visits: 0
|
With mocap on the scene, will CTA in the future have any advantages? Cheers, René Edit: And recognition of facial expressions, included eye movement?
|
|
Peter (RL)
|
Peter (RL)
Posted 14 Years Ago
|
|
Group: Administrators
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 23.1K,
Visits: 36.6K
|
winterswimmer (9/19/2011) I wasn't sure whether to buy Crazy Animator, or CrazyTalk 6, but eventually I bought CrazyTalk 6 Pro, for a number of reasons. E.g. I want the best possible results in creating faces that talk (designing my own faces, mostly). I can't take the risk of buying a program which is not dedicated for THIS task.
But I also want to make a suggestion for one important improvement, that CrazyTalk badly needs at the moment. CrazyTalk needs the ability to import phonemes, in a simple symbolic language for which third-party tools can generate "lip sync codes".
This is very important. Now... I am a PROLOG / A.I. programmer, also using other languages (and lots of pure Assembly language sometimes); I can write code that generates lip syncing script, (based on pure text only). And I also feel that the "next generation" of Text-to-Speech software will include lip-sync generation as a standard, some day.
You lose nothing by enabling people like me, to... effectively work FOR you; no payment is necessary for such programming efforts. :) Please consider it, it is a win-win situation good for all of us! (more later...)
_________ P.S. I am also (almost) completely bilingual, in English and in Greek (ex-UK-resident Greek).
I've already used your demo versions to create some videos, with thousands of views in YouTube, etc. I even tested CrazyTalk with Greek speech, and it worked; with lots of corrections by hand, of course, but... not much more than needed in English.
I bought CrazyTalk 6 Pro + Toolboxes today, because of much appreciation for this program. I've also seen CrazyTalk animator, but as I said, it is outside my main field of interest, which is generating convincing Talking Faces, for use in Videos and narration, etc.Many thanks for the suggestions. I will pass these to the CrazyTalk team for review. :)
Peter Forum Administrator www.reallusion.com
|
|
Peter (RL)
|
Peter (RL)
Posted 14 Years Ago
|
|
Group: Administrators
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 23.1K,
Visits: 36.6K
|
Rene77 (9/19/2011)
With mocap on the scene, will CTA in the future have any advantages? Cheers, René Edit: And recognition of facial expressions, included eye movement? Facial and full body mocap are certainly a possibility for future upgrades. However at the moment there is nothing to report in this direction.
Peter Forum Administrator www.reallusion.com
|