As I clearly demonstrated above, you can get the same results in iClone. Gerry shows that as well.
So why do you ignore these posts and continue to state your non-issue?
What's in it for me if I state my "non-issue"?
I may be ignorant (since I'm new and all), but I don't remember ignoring anything.
I don't quite agree that you "clearly demonstrated above" that you can get the same results in iClone. You yourself said "iClone renders a bit darker" even under the same lighting condition, didn't you?
Now, I just saw Gerry's post. That's fantastic if that means you get exactly the same skin tone under exactly the same lighting condition across CC and iClone. But the other three (you, Data Juggler, and I) failed to achieve that. So I honestly don't understand how Gerry was able to make that happen, but not the other three.
When you set up the same lighting condition in iClone, I don't know how to exactly locate each and every light in exactly the same location and at exactly the same angle (like Gerry apparently did), so I removed all the existing lights from CC and iClone. In CC, somehow you can still see the character even after removing all the lights. But in iClone, the character is solid black so you can't see any thing except its outline. And when you turn on only auxiliary light, the iClone character is clearly darker than the CC character.
So I'm guessing the brighter tone in CC is due to the fact that there's still some light in CC even when you turned off all the lights. Am I wrong about this?