I had a chance to download and install RT 4.0, which is indeed accepted.

I exported an old test scene, and one thing I found was that the camera settings were completely off. For some reason the focal distance was too large (about a 100 times it seems), so I had to adjust the camera. I remember that camera settings (including DOF) were never transferred correctly.

---

76% of original size (was 661x19) - Click to enlarge

The results that I showed are the same with any camera. "Switch" is not a camera, it is just switching from one camera view to another - as the name implies.


Gerry

---

System: Win 10 Pro (21H2), Asus X99-E WS, CPU i7-5930K -3,5 GHz, 32 GB DDR4 2666-16 RAM, NVidia GTX 1080 Ti GPU - 11 GB VRAM(Driver Studio-536.99), Samsung 850 Pro 512 GB SSD, 6 TB HD storage.

Hmmm...maybe a 'switch' cam works, but maybe not if an actual camera.  I haven't tested beyond my initial test, but I see 'switch' was being used.

The 2 screen shots below show the iClone view - including the Preview Camera in the Mini Viewport, and the render view in Indigo RT 4.
76% of original size (was 661x19) - Click to enlarge

76% of original size (was 661x19) - Click to enlarge

I didn't wait for a clean render in Indigo as I just wanted to demonstrate what was being rendered.



Gerry

---

System: Win 10 Pro (21H2), Asus X99-E WS, CPU i7-5930K -3,5 GHz, 32 GB DDR4 2666-16 RAM, NVidia GTX 1080 Ti GPU - 11 GB VRAM(Driver Studio-536.99), Samsung 850 Pro 512 GB SSD, 6 TB HD storage.

Let me be politically incorrect and say: Not True. It always takes a scene from a viewport regardless how many cameras you have set at your scene and which one is rendering your current viewport. :Whistling:

LOL...the 'political' way to say it:
It's not determinably a "Bug", it is essentially, what amounts to, in context of the course of what we would say is good working order, an "export deviation".

Late response... That would be a bug. The exported scene should be the same as what is shown in the viewport through the selected camera, give or take some deviations in camera settings.

---

76% of original size (was 661x19) - Click to enlarge

Did anyone ever notice that Indigo....IS AWEESSSSSOMME!!!!

Just kidding...

Did anyone ever notice that when you export a scene from iClone to Indigo, Indigo takes the scene only from the Preview Camera.  So if you have Preview of a scene in iClone which is overhead, and then you have a Camera set up on a character's face, and you export out, Indigo will show the overhead view. 
Don't remember, was it always like this?...If so, it was a missed thing they could have had in the plugin tab, like a Camera select menu. 
(But, guessing we won't see any more development now...
I mean, dear me...with Lord Iray entering the Kingdom of Iclonington?....He will likely have NONE of it! )

The beautiful video posted by 4u2ges (at the 0:06 mark) reminded me of this "Hair and Collision Objects" issue I put in Feedback Tracker:
https://www.reallusion.com/FeedBackTracker/Issue/Collision-Shapes-G6-CC-very-bad-for-long-when-when-character-bends-forward

It's "On hold."

I wonder if the body mesh updates in CC3 will include fixes to the collision objects.
(I think I'll go ask that over there.)

---

iClone 7... Character Creator... Substance Designer/Painter... Blender... Audacity...
Desktop (homebuilt) - Windows 10, Ryzen 9 3900x CPU, GTX 1080 GPU (8GB), 32GB RAM, Asus X570 Pro motherboard, 2TB SSD, terabytes of disk space, dual  monitors.
Laptop - Windows 10, MSI GS63VR STEALTH-252, 16GB RAM, GTX 1060 (6GB), 256GB SSD and 1TB HDD

Bless you for having made that video.  It must have taken eons to export out!

Not really. Whole thing took 3.5h (including export) with render speed 30 spf

Did you see in the recent RL Genesis 8 tutorial, Kai says, referring to Iray @ around 1:04:00- "Think this....Indigo, but faster...and better"....
OUCH! 

I've seen an Iray demo. Single character + IBL. 5-6 seconds to build (black screen) + about about 25 sec to render. Then they moved camera and the build time was again around 5 sec. So I would not be so sure it'd be faster than Indigo RT4.