aknzrdude (11/11/2009)
Chris you surprise me - the word sabotage is a harsh word and is really offensive me - you also mention hostility - where did that come from - nowhere was there any form of hostility - i respect you as an artist and so when you solicit comments - i give you my honest opinion - my comments are not intended to offend or 'sabotage' the thread - next time you solicit comments, be advised that there are other opinions - does not mean yours is wrong, only means other see it a different way - to clarify my points
you seem to take the word 'bias' in a negative way - it is not it just means that by asking the question it changes my frame of mind - it is different from instinct - when i first looked at picture my eyes were drawn to the orange light - having asked the question, i looked again but this time at the background - so my point is by asking the question, you change my frame of mind in that i was searching for other details rather than jsut lookign at the first thing that drew my attention
"anachronism" - again you seem to take this as an offense - when it was a compliment - meaning to say becuase of the disconnect in the weapons and the settings it draws the person's interest more
finally you say "PS: I love these artistic debates"
yes but let's get thick skinned firstDear Gabe,
just like you have your opinions I have mine, and we are here to share them, in a nice and polite manner of course. ;) The way you phrased your post felt like you were challenging the way I was trying to teach my point. therefore challenge = aggressive. If that was not your intention fine, if it was, well that is fine too. Like you said we are all entitle to our own views and opinions. And i respect that. That's why when i replied to you, i did it in a polite way and not start yelling at you. I also try to clarify the points you looked confused or felt weird about. Again, in a polite manner. BTW the fact that I replied in this way shows that I'm plenty thick shinned. FYI
Also, sorry if the the word sabotage offended you and it felt harsh, so how about i call it focus shifting intead. Becuase that is what your post was, so much so that you got now someone else second guessing himself, and I was not the only one thinking that, because someone posted right below you , in his own words of course, to stay with the thread.
However lets get back to the heart of your post, this is what it sounded like to me:
The fact that I asked the question, made you second guess yourself, and made you start looking for a different answer beyond the obvious. Is that what you were trying to say?
My question to you is why? This is the post where "the question" in question (pun intended :D ) came in:
"Great observations guys.
So based on all the lists so far, what would you say the answer to the questions is?
how do we keep the audience's attention from wandering around the images?"
I highlited the "so based on all the lists so far" for you because if you missed that i could see why things got weird for you. However, I also was reassuring people that their lists had enough commonality that they were ready to answer the question. And please noticed that i waited until enough people gave their lists before asking the question.
By doing this there was no second guessing involved. The answer was obvious. "Lighting" is a great tool to guide the audience's look at point. One of the many ways available.
After people posted their answers, I was going to mentioned why and how to achieve this using iclone. Because even if people know the obvious answer sometime they just dont know how to apply it correctly in their projects. Does the answer mean by putting a spotlight on your character, no. Sure this works if you are doing theater and the likes, but what about if your are trying to do a day time scene where both the actors and the background share the same lights? what can you do?
This is where Paumanok answer comes in, minus a few minor details he nailed it:
1. Reduce contrast and brightness in the background; increase it in the foreground2. Use cooler colors whenever possible because warmer colors are thought to approach the viewer3. Minimize movement in the background; also minimize movement of other characters while any given character has the stage!4. Avoid clutter and treat the scene as a stage, with empty areas for the actors to move
And he was the originator of this question. He was the reason i started this thread. When I saw his answer, it put a big smile on my face cause i knew the wisdom I was trying to share has been passed. He saw deep into the answer, past the obvious meaning and nailed it. Bravo man! :D
I know from now on he will never see an image the same way again and his art will benefit that much more from it.
Sure , i could have just given the answer out without using an APE(audience participation excersice) but it is my experience that if you learn things through self-realisation and doing, you tend to embed the answer better in your brain and really apply what you learn, instead of going: "oh that makes sense" and then forget to apply what you learned.
This was the methodology behind my training on this post and the result is the reason I enjoy teaching.
This all happen before your post. Perhaps if you would have worded things difrerently, like saying : hey cris what did you mean by this.... Instead of saying: look at what you are making me do by asking this question... i might have been able to explain all this before the drama. thats all im saying. I have no ill will towards you. But I will stand by my methods unless you can prove them misleading. And then of course i will apologize. And say thank you.
Peace brother in arts,
Stuckon3d
PS: I trully live by my signature "
the way is in training". It really is.

Product Specialist
My iClone 7 gallery
My IMDB