I gotcha, but your review of the motion is in fact your use of the FBX file here.  This is a very specific and specialized request of yours involving animations to Lightwave.
Whether or not you animate the FBX or have it sit as a ZIP in a folder unused does not remove the work done to provide it to you.

Instead of buying iClone 7 / CC3, etc., on your own wager that it works, you would like a user, who bought on their own set of wagers, to give you a sample, as courtesy for your asking. 

What I am saying to other users, not so much you, is that RL obviously gets paid if you do in turn purchase, so a user providing you with such courtesy externally and outside of this forum may wish to be also be paid for essentially doing the marketing that RL has not done for you, as you mention that RL had not responded to your requests.  In effect, that user ultimately encourages a sale for RL. 

To you, I would dare say instead of asking another user to supply you with a courtesy FBX copy, instead ask RL to give you a courtesy copy of iC7, then you have it all - they might, you never know! 

But if you then say to me you wouldn't do that because it sounds silly or far-fetched, then effectively you say another user performing the task for compensation is not silly or far-fetched.  (I am directing this towards the other users.)

If RL itself disagrees with this notion, that is great as so long as they have the free marketing sample for you to try.  So any contact with RL ultimately has to funnel back to that they provide you with a marketing courtesy-copy for you as a potential purchaser.  Which is a bigger point, they have opportunity for various other sales that are possibly, like you, sitting on a fence because they don't have samples of some type that would satisfy a curious potential purchaser. 

You actually are showcasing a potential additional revenue-booster for them through this request, and as such, I say you deserve the courtesy sample + a courtesy version of IC&/CC3, etc....or at least a discount!