|
Author
|
Message
|
|
The-any-Key
|
The-any-Key
Posted 5 Years Ago
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 3 Weeks Ago
Posts: 356,
Visits: 1.9K
|
Updated my list:
(Best times monitor 1920x1080 - frame size 3840x2160 - fullscreen - no bar)
[Calced time if render a 10 minute scene with 24fps]
GTX 2080 TI GamingPro 11GB 1 348 USD 01:30 [15h] GTX 1080 TI mini 11GB 939 USD 01:35 [15h 50m] Titan XP 12GB 1 315 USD 01:40 [16h 40m] RTX 2080 8GB 980 USD 01:45 [17h 30m]
GTX 1080 TI 11GB 916 USD 01:46 [17h 49m] GTX 1080 TI 11GB 916 USD 01:46 [17h 49m]
GTX 1080 8GB 722 USD 01:57 [19h 30m]
TITAN RTX 24GB 3 127 USD 02:00 [20h]
RTX 2070 8GB 679 USD 02:01 [20h 10m] GTX 1080 TI 11GB 916 USD 02:14 [22h 20m] GTX 1070 8GB Laptop ??? USD 02:42 [27h 9m] GTX 1070 8GB 517 USD 02:51 [28h 30m] RTX 2070 8GB 679 USD 02:54 [29h] GTX 1060 6Gb 291 USD 32:08 [13d 9h 20m]
Maybe we should run a longer monitor 1920x1080 and frame size 1920x1080 test for all. As my was 0:35 and the Titan had 0:31. It may also depend when we start the clock. I start as fast I click the save button (this adds the init time). A little longer test for monitor 1920x1080 and frame size 1920x1080 would maybe make the times more accurate.
iClone 7, 3DXchange 7 Pipeline, CC3 Pipeline, CT8 Pipeline, Iray, Live Face, iPhone Xr, Win 10, i9 9900K ~5GHz, Nvidia RTX 2080 8GB, 16GB Ram, M.2 SSD
Edited
5 Years Ago by
The-any-Key
|
|
|
|
|
Kelleytoons
|
Kelleytoons
Posted 5 Years Ago
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 3 hours ago
Posts: 9.2K,
Visits: 21.8K
|
argus1000 (3/1/2019)
With frame size 3840x2160 2 minutes
With frame size 1920x1080 31 seconds
..Oh THANK GOD! -- compared to my own Titan XP, this performance is only so-so (CPP ratio very, very poor -- price would need to be like $1800 to be even slightly viable). I can now rest easily knowing I'm just fine. Thanks! (At this point now I'm interested to see what nVidia does this fall, when they'll release their new cards. Hopefully we'll see some amazing things then).
Alienware Aurora R16, Win 11, i9-149000KF, 3.20GHz CPU, 64GB RAM, RTX 4090 (24GB), Samsung 870 Pro 8TB, Gen3 MVNe M-2 SSD, 4TBx2, 39" Alienware Widescreen Monitor
Mike "ex-genius" Kelley
|
|
|
|
|
illusionLAB
|
illusionLAB
Posted 5 Years Ago
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Years Ago
Posts: 393,
Visits: 4.8K
|
Hey T-a-k, I just ran the test again with the "Full screen optimize" etc. and the time for my RTX 2070 was 2:01 - which feels about right as it's benchmark scores are usually neck and neck with the 1080ti.
|
|
|
|
|
animagic
|
animagic
Posted 5 Years Ago
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 11 hours ago
Posts: 15.7K,
Visits: 30.5K
|
The Titan RTX result is puzzling. It is worse than that of the GTX 1080 ti and on par with the RTX 2070...  When testing it indeed important to reduce the screen resolution to 1920x1080. I have a 4k screen and reducing the screen resolution gave me better results.
|
|
|
|
|
TheOldBuffer
|
TheOldBuffer
Posted 5 Years Ago
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Month
Posts: 429,
Visits: 6.4K
|
Hi guys. my first RTX 2080 Ti sadly died so I decided the replacement had to fit into a more suitable home so I've built a new computer around it. I've ran both the benchmarks. test 1 1920 x 1080 = 28.7 secs test 2 3480 x 2160 = 1: 22 I'm very happy with the results  .
Homebuilt computer - Windoze 10, INTEL i9 9900 k @ 5.1 GHz, EVGA RTX 2080 TI XC ULTRA, 16GB 3100 MHz RAM, Asus Maximus Hero XI motherboard, Sound blaster Z series. iClone6 & 7 Pipeline, Crazytalk 8, Crazytalk Animator 2, Facefilter, Pop video 3, Hitfilm 4Pro, Cubase 8.5 Pro,
Edited
5 Years Ago by
TheOldBuffer
|
|
|
|
|
eyeweaver
|
eyeweaver
Posted 5 Years Ago
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Years Ago
Posts: 20,
Visits: 181
|
the TITAN RTX 24GB results don't make any sense!can someone explain?
|
|
|
|
|
The-any-Key
|
The-any-Key
Posted 5 Years Ago
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 3 Weeks Ago
Posts: 356,
Visits: 1.9K
|
eyeweaver (4/19/2019)
the TITAN RTX 24GB results don't make any sense!can someone explain?It make sense if you are a software developer. When you develop a software you choose what hardware features you want to integrate into the software. What resources the software can use and how to use them. This means that iClone don´t use the resources from the GPU in a optimal way. It can also be a bottleneck effect. Say you got a good GPU but a bad CPU, got bad memory clock, got 10000 processes running at the same time when you render, got outdated drivers, got errors in the OS... everything counts and can be a bottleneck.
iClone 7, 3DXchange 7 Pipeline, CC3 Pipeline, CT8 Pipeline, Iray, Live Face, iPhone Xr, Win 10, i9 9900K ~5GHz, Nvidia RTX 2080 8GB, 16GB Ram, M.2 SSD
|
|
|
|
|
3dtester
|
3dtester
Posted 5 Years Ago
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Month
Posts: 995,
Visits: 2.2K
|
It might be of interest what driver type was used. Either the GRD (Game Ready Driver) or the CRD (Creator Ready Driver). I expect the GRD to work better with iClone.
Edited
5 Years Ago by
3dtester
|
|
|
|
|
eat_me_toyota
|
eat_me_toyota
Posted 5 Years Ago
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 3 Years Ago
Posts: 30,
Visits: 433
|
Was scratching my head when it took my 2080 TI 1:32, but the monitor is 4K and CPU is 17 5930K. So guess that's an expected result.
|
|
|
|
|
argus1000
|
argus1000
Posted 5 Years Ago
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Yesterday
Posts: 585,
Visits: 11.3K
|
eyeweaver (4/19/2019)
the TITAN RTX 24GB results don't make any sense!can someone explain? 2 I re-did the test. The first one was faulty. I have 2 computers, one with an nVidia GTX 1080 with 8 GB of VRAM. the other with the nVidia Titan RTX with 24 GB of VRAM. I rendered a 70 MB 16 seconds file at 1920X1080. nVidia GTX 1080 with 8 GB VRAM: 16 minutes 30 seconds nVidia Titan RTX with 24 GB of VRAM.: 7 minutes 40 seconds Makes more sense?
My latest movie THE GOLDEN MAN, and a few others: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIl1EqVCKitZzLqaNnLK0BA
|
|
|
|